Fantendo - Game Ideas & More
Don't have an account?
Register
Register
Fantendo - Game Ideas & More
Fantendo - Game Ideas & More!
45,971
pages
in: Fantendo

Changes: Fantendo:Sysop Approval

Back to page
Sign in to edit
No edit summary
Tag: rte-source
(Merging Project:Sysop Approval Requests into this page)
Tag: Source edit
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
[[File:Symbolsilver.png|30px|right]]
−
'''Sysop Approval''' is one of the systems to selecting high-quality articles on the wiki. All Sysop Approved articles are decided by the [[Project:Admins|administrators]]. {{PAGESINCATEGORY:Sysop Approved|pages}} articles have been given Sysop Approval status. 
 +
'''Sysop Approval''' is one of the systems for selecting and distinguishing high-quality articles on the wiki. All Sysop Approved articles are decided by the [[Project:Admins|administrators]].
   
  +
{{PAGESINCATEGORY:Sysop Approved|pages}} articles have been given Sysop Approval status. If you want to compare your article to some of these, and see what it takes to become Sysop Approved, you can visit the [[:Category:Sysop Approved|Sysop Approved]] category.
−
==What is Sysop Approval?==
  
−
[[File:Symbolsilver.png|30px|right]]As previously mentioned, Sysop Approval is the administrative team's selection of the higher-quality articles on the wiki.
  
   
  ⚫
Some articles go beyond the recognition and standard of Sysop Approval, and can later be nominated for the [[Project:Featured Articles|Featured Article]] position, which is for acknowledging articles that stand as the best of the best in their represented field.
⚫
The idea was originally presented by {{user|Spark01}}, with the intent of being able to quickly find the best articles on the wiki if the wiki was ever imported to a different host. You can view every Sysop Approved article through the [[:Category:Sysop Approved|Sysop Approved]] category. Sysop Approved articles can also be distinguished by the template that adds this category, which appears as a silver badge with a small S floating in the top-right corner of the window. 
  
   
  +
==History==
⚫
In more current times, Sysop Approval is used mainly to point out some of the highest-quality articles being made on the wiki. Some articles go beyond the recognition and standard of Sysop Approval, and can later be nominated for the [[Fantendo: Featured Articles|Featured Article]] position, which is for acknowledging articles that stand as the best of the best in their represented field.
  
  ⚫
The idea was originally presented by {{user|Spark01}}, with the intent of being able to quickly find the best articles on the wiki if Fantendo was ever imported to a different host. You can view every Sysop Approved article through the [[:Category:Sysop Approved|Sysop Approved]] category. Sysop Approved articles can also be distinguished by the template that adds this category, which appears as a silver badge with a small S floating in the top-right corner of the window. 
   
  +
Sysop Approval is now mainly used to point out some of the highest-quality articles being made on the wiki.
−
==Can I request a Sysop Approval?==
  
  +
−
Yes, anybody can request a Sysop Approval. However, please do not be pushy to the administrators about an article becoming Sysop Approved, and try to understand that sometimes to become a Sysop Approved article, some criticism will be applied to make sure your article is suited. If you want to compare your article to some of the other Sysop Approved articles and see what it takes to become Sysop Approved, you can visit the respective category, [[:Category:Sysop Approved|Sysop Approved]]. If you want to request a sysop approval, please visit the respective [[Project:Sysop Approval Requests|requesting page]].[[Category:Fantendo]]
  
  +
==Requests==
  +
If you believe that a page you've created is worthy of being one of the many [[Fantendo:Sysop Approval|sysop approved]] articles on Fantendo, add a request here. A member of the sysop team will look over your request, see if it is eligible to become approved, and either approve it or leave constructive criticism for what can be improved.
  +
  +
Try to not nominate works of others, unless you have explicit permission from them saying to do so.
  +
  +
Please try not to excessively request articles, as such you can only nominate up to three at one time, and you must wait until that batch is evaluated before presenting more requests.
  +
  +
;Legend
  +
*{{s/yes}} Page has been approved
  +
*{{s/no}} Page has not been approved
  +
  +
==Pending requests==
  +
  +
==Finished requests==
  +
Here is a list of the previous requests.
  +
*[[Super Mario Party 2]] - {{s/yes}} fantastic, well made page. definitely deserving of the approval. big fan of the new additions to the SMP formula, the layout is great and its a joy to read. {{User|SynSynful}}
  +
*[[Fightop]] - {{s/no}} good start but the article is quite bland with no offense being meant. try using some tables if you can and images to give an aesthetic feel to the page. an example would be tables for your characters with little descriptions about who they are, what series they're from etc. and maybe even some tables for your movesets and items would help it have a nicer format as well. great start and i hope you continue to improve your article and don't be afraid to submit another request in the future! [[User:NovaPen|NovaPen]] ([[User talk:NovaPen|talk]]) 14:58, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
  +
*[[Kicking Dust]] - {{s/yes}} quite well written and detailed page, the episodes are formatted in a way that is not only easy to read but enjoyable, art is cute and the page itself is aesthetically pleasing in its own right. it's obvious you put a lot of effort into this project! well done! [[User:NovaPen|NovaPen]] ([[User talk:NovaPen|talk]]) 08:03, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
  +
*[[Luigi's Mansion: Witching Hour]] – {{s/no}} You're well on your way to a good page, and you are clearly putting effort into this project. The only reason I'm not approving this yet is that I think more of the content should be filled out first and I think some areas could be a little more detailed, but keep working on it and I'm sure we'll be able to get it approved. –[[User:StellaStardown|StellaStardown]] ([[User talk:StellaStardown|talk]]) 00:35, October 6, 2020 (UTC)
  +
*[[Super Smash Bros. Ultimate x DOOM]] – {{s/yes}} The formatting, particularly in the trailer section and the tables, could still use some work, but this page features a sufficient amount of comprehensive and thorough content for a sysop approval. –[[User:StellaStardown|StellaStardown]] ([[User talk:StellaStardown|talk]]) 00:35, October 6, 2020 (UTC)
  +
*[[Super Smash Bros. Void (Fankemonbricka)]] - {{s/yes}} Substantial content, well-presented layout, basically everything you look for in a sysop approved page! {{LumoshiSig}} 22:39, August 30, 2020 (UTC)
  +
*[[Agate: Bloodbath]] - {{s/yes}} Well-written page with plenty of content and explanation, great page! {{LumoshiSig}} 22:39, August 30, 2020 (UTC)
  +
*[[The Legend of Zelda: The Shadow King]] - {{s/yes}} Great page, absolutely love the image background for the tables! {{LumoshiSig}} 22:39, August 30, 2020 (UTC)
  +
*[[KillGames 2]] - {{s/yes}} Great level of detail here, you definitely put in a lot of work to this page! {{LumoshiSig}} 23:52, July 30, 2020 (UTC)
  +
*[[Super Smash Bros. Unbounded]] - {{s/yes}} Very well put-together page! The page is aesthetically appealing with the table backgrounds and different header colors, and there is quite a lot of detail to it. {{LumoshiSig}} 23:42, July 30, 2020 (UTC)
  +
*[[SteamSiege]] - {{s/yes}} (requested on Discord, putting here for record-keeping) The page looks pretty great, I feel that it could be a little more varied visually but overall it looks like you did a very good job with it and all the detailed information about everything in it. {{LumoshiSig}} 08:31, July 25, 2020 (UTC)
  +
*[[The Third Mario Bro. (Piper)]] - {{s/no}} This isn't a bad article and there's clearly effort here, but the strange formatting in some sections, the casual wording, and the poor grammar in some parts all serve to make this page a bit too unpolished. I'd also recommend splitting up some of the paragraphs. –[[User:StellaStardown|StellaStardown]] ([[User talk:StellaStardown|talk]]) 02:45, July 19, 2020 (UTC)
  +
*[[Mario Kart Something]] - {{s/yes}} Everything is explained in great detail, I like all the effort you took on that! {{LumoshiSig}} 18:32, July 15, 2020 (UTC)
  +
* [[Sonic Speed 2: Second Act]] - {{s/yes}} Very detailed page, visually appealing! {{LumoshiSig}} 04:14, July 15, 2020 (UTC)
  +
* [[Sugar Cannon]] - {{s/yes}} Like the thorough explanations and variety of colorings on the tables! {{LumoshiSig}} 04:14, July 15, 2020 (UTC)
  +
*[[Dragon Ball Z Budokai Battle 2]] - {{s/yes}} Good amount of content, well-structured, looks good visually. It's got my vote! {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Superstition]] - {{s/yes}} Very polished and unique! I think this is a great article :> {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Super Smash Bros. Something]] - {{s/yes}} While its a little rough around the edges and listy in some areas, there's a lot of content here and the custom art of all the characters lends the page a unique charm that I admire. Has my approval! {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Glenn's Adventure]] - {{s/no}} There's nothing wrong with this page inherently except that I feel there's not enough yet. All you really have to do is to add more substantial information to the game (i.e. stronger location descriptions, available goods and weapon upgrade pages, extra bosses, more enemies) and you'll net the award. {{AS Alttt}}
  +
*[[Fantendo Smash Bros. Combat (erictom333)]] - {{s/no}} This is, for the moment, just a group of white tables that don't really meet the article criteria particularly well. I recommend trying to build upon the presentation. {{AS Alttt}}
  +
*[[Super Smash Bros. Ultimate x Minecraft]] - {{s/yes}} Very in-depth with good presentation and premises, absolutely deserving of sysop approval. {{AS Alttt}}
  +
* [[Super Smash Bros. Ultimate x Darkest Dungeon]] - {{s/yes}} The presentation is absolutely phenomenal and there's a sizable amount of content too, definitely deserves approval! {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Fantendo Smash Bros. Combat (erictom333)]] - {{s/no}} This is shaping up to be much better than it originally was, but it's still somewhat messy in the presentation and it's very easy to tell the article has a long way to go given by how little substance there is on the page besides tables. Try to write out as much as you can until you ''really'' feel like you've nailed it. {{AS Alttt}}
  +
*[[Super Smash Bros. Ultimate x COLD❄BLOOD]] - {{s/yes}} Well polished and thought out, very solid stuff here. Great article. {{Exotoro/sig10/smol}}
  +
*[[Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Time of Blaze and Time of Darkness]] - {{s/no}} While its a very good start, the page currently feels a bit too listy for my liking. It's definitely on the road to something fantastic, though! {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Fantendo Smash Bros. Combat (erictom333)]] - {{s/yes}} Has definitely responded to criticism and feedback well and improved greatly as a result. Definitely earned its approval! {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Super Smash Bros. Ultimate x JoJo's Bizarre Adventure]] - {{s/yes}} Incredible amounts of effort and polish, another shining example of Ultimate DLC content. {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Nintenexus]] - {{S/no}} unfortunately a bit barebones when it comes to actual gameplay. the page tends to look professional but a lot of content i would expect for such a saturated genre on here just isn't on here. {{Exotoro/sig10/smol}}
  +
*[[KillGames]] - {{S/yes}} an original ip with a lot of effort and polish and very well detailed. Great job! {{Exotoro/sig10/smol}}
  +
*[[Nintenexus]] - {{s/no}} Improved but still a bit listy, still lacks the gameplay aspect addressed by Exo previously. Keep up the hard work! {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Super Smash Bros. Ultimate X Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night]] - {{s/yes}} A truly remarkable DLC pack that has an absurd amount of effort put into it. Your care and dedication shine through! {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Nintenexus]] - {{s/no}} Unfortunately despite some impressive steps, the article really hasn't addressed the previous criticisms levied at it. Keep it up though! {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Splatoon: Splativerse]] - {{s/yes}} Impressive presentation and a very good amount of information, this is a high quality article for sure! {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Kingdombound]] - {{s/yes}} Simple but charming and effective presentation, alongside equally charming art, elevate this article into something that deserves sysop approval for the hard work. {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Super Smash Bros. Dokkan]] - {{s/no}} The article's main problem at the moment, despite its visual polish, is its list-like nature and large amount of empty space that hasn't filled in yet. Could use some more reorganization. {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Super Smash Bros. Ultimate x Five Nights at Freddy's]] - {{s/no}} The page is unfortunately a bit basic, and in comparison to other SSBU DLC articles we've given approval, doesn't really represent a certain level of polish.
  +
*''[[Spectral Flowers of the Illusionary Winter]]'' - {{s/yes}} While not visually impressive and the text can be hard to read, this is a really solid effort for a underrepped series on this wiki. Good work. {{Exotoro/sig10/smol}}
  +
*''[[Draco Duel 2]]'' - {{s/yes}} Visually impressive article with some unique mechanics and a pretty cool cast continuing an original ip. {{Exotoro/sig10/smol}}
  +
*[[Super Smash Bros. Ultimate x One Step From Eden]] - {{s/yes}} Visually gorgeous with a complete move-set, this is a pretty tread ground but Ink manages to make it feel unique every time. {{Exotoro/sig10/smol}}
  +
*[[Super Smash Bros. Ultimate x Team Fortress 2]] - {{s/yes}} Ditto. {{Exotoro/sig10/smol}}
  +
*[[Wendell]] - {{s/no}} This page looks great but it certainly isn't among our finer canon character pages, at least to me. It's excellent formatted, so be proud of your work on this one. {{AS Alttt}}
  +
*[[Geno]] - {{s/no}} I feel similarly about this page, although I was more on the fence because Geno has more going for him. {{AS Alttt}}
  +
*[[Puddle's Super Smash Bros.]] - {{s/yes}} Outstanding visual design and the article is chock-full of content. {{AS Alttt}}
  +
*[[Pikmin: Ultrahunt]] - {{s/yes}} Completely finished and has all the content it needs to. I would have given the tables a visual overhaul but the fact of the matter is that the page is finished and still looks good. {{AS Alttt}}
  +
*[[COLD❄BLOOD/Story Mode: Zinfestation]] - {{s/yes}} I have written several essays about why this is a good story, and it's def sysop approval worthy. {{Exotoro/sig10/smol}}
  +
*[[Final Heroes]] - {{s/yes}} Really dense with detail, excellent CSS, and just a lot of fun character to this page overall. Pretty much everything is here for a great article, so it's just a matter of finishing it for a feature as far as I feel. {{Exotoro/sig10/smol}}
  +
*[[Pyroverse: Breach]] - {{s/yes}} A visually Hecking Nice page with a lot of reeeally good content already, even though it's still a work in progress. Really looking forward to seeing how Tiera's saga comes to a close <s>as well as the day when I finally get caught up on the story im sry for being so behinddddddd</s>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[[User:IncarnateParanoia|-- Ink]]
  +
*[[Kotomo]] - {{s/yes}} Same as above, except this one also has Furnolem, who I wish to give hugs.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[[User:IncarnateParanoia|-- Ink]]
  +
*[[Super Smash Bros. Void (Fankemonbricka)]] - {{s/no}} I suggest removing the stage gallery and turning it into a table and giving the article a little more style finesse. {{AS Alttt}}
  +
*[[Super Smash Bros. Ultimate x Kingdom Rush]] - {{s/yes}} Remarkably good presentation across the board and loads of detail overall but never to a point where I found distracting (although Linirea's description is long it's not long for the wrong reasons). Everything is remarkably well thought out and your love for Kingdom Rush is shown well through the way you handled fighters (especially liking the chad King Denas here) and also spirits. Deserving of an SA. {{AS Alttt}}
  +
*[[re:Incarnations]] - {{s/yes}} Remarkable CSS and presentation so far. This is really short though and I was almost considering not giving you one in the first place because of it. I recommend building it up a lot more. {{AS Alttt}}
  +
*[[Clash X]] - {{s/yes}} nicely formatted, really good-looking overall. custom sprites are a really nice touch [[User:WesternSkies|my sig is too big]] ([[User talk:WesternSkies|talk]]) 13:18, June 21, 2020 (UTC)
  +
*[[Agate]] - {{s/no}} its definitely a good article, but it lacks a certain amount of visual flair that most other approved articles have. namely, the tables that take up most of the page are extremely dull to look at. [[User:WesternSkies|my sig is too big]] ([[User talk:WesternSkies|talk]]) 13:18, June 21, 2020 (UTC)
  +
*[[World of Animals]] - {{s/yes}} god thats an immense amount of detail. its obvious a lot of hard work and love have been put into this article [[User:WesternSkies|my sig is too big]] ([[User talk:WesternSkies|talk]]) 13:18, June 21, 2020 (UTC)
  +
*[[Agate]] - {{s/yes}} Good charm, good detail, and good presentation. Well-fleshed out article for me! {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Glenn's Adventure]] - [[Glenn's Adventure/Misstical Mystery|Misstical Mystery]] - {{s/yes}} Has good style, presentation, and attention to detail! I feel like the main page's weird nature as sort of a disambiguation page for the two halves- with less detail/presentation value- makes it hard for me to give approval to it, but Misstical Mystery absolutely deserves it! {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[The Legend of Zelda: Dungeon Masters]]- {{s/yes}} Though possibly construable as a list page, the amount of effort gone into the art helps it stand out and it retains the fun charm of Crak's other works very very well. Super good stuff! {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Godzilla: Destroy All Monsters Ultimate]]- {{s/yes}} A bit listy but the effort with art is very very admirable! Great work! {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Heirs to the Wrath/Requiem from the Dunes]]- {{s/yes}} HttW's presentation and style remain winners and this content update continues that polish and quality. Stunning work! {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Super Smash Bros. Ultimate X Touhou Project]] - {{s/yes}} The amount of detail and in-depth content here is staggering, totally worthy of SA status alongside presentation. {{PyroSig}}
  +
*[[Deadworld]] - {{s/yes}} Great presentation, very unique concepts, and extreme amount of detail devoted to ensuring it all comes together smoothly. Great job! {{PyroSig}}
  +
  +
{{SA2019}}
  +
{{SA2018}}
  +
{{SA2017}}
  +
{{SA2016}}
  +
{{SA2015}}
  +
{{SA2014}}
  +
[[Category:Fantendo]]

Revision as of 00:27, 17 November 2020

Symbolsilver

Sysop Approval is one of the systems for selecting and distinguishing high-quality articles on the wiki. All Sysop Approved articles are decided by the administrators.

947 articles have been given Sysop Approval status. If you want to compare your article to some of these, and see what it takes to become Sysop Approved, you can visit the Sysop Approved category.

Some articles go beyond the recognition and standard of Sysop Approval, and can later be nominated for the Featured Article position, which is for acknowledging articles that stand as the best of the best in their represented field.

History

The idea was originally presented by Spark01 (t∣b∣c), with the intent of being able to quickly find the best articles on the wiki if Fantendo was ever imported to a different host. You can view every Sysop Approved article through the Sysop Approved category. Sysop Approved articles can also be distinguished by the template that adds this category, which appears as a silver badge with a small S floating in the top-right corner of the window. 

Sysop Approval is now mainly used to point out some of the highest-quality articles being made on the wiki.

Requests

If you believe that a page you've created is worthy of being one of the many sysop approved articles on Fantendo, add a request here. A member of the sysop team will look over your request, see if it is eligible to become approved, and either approve it or leave constructive criticism for what can be improved.

Try to not nominate works of others, unless you have explicit permission from them saying to do so.

Please try not to excessively request articles, as such you can only nominate up to three at one time, and you must wait until that batch is evaluated before presenting more requests.

Legend
  • Support — Page has been approved
  • Oppose — Page has not been approved

Pending requests

Finished requests

Here is a list of the previous requests.


2019
2018
2017
2016
💕 athena, goddess of light! 💕
  • Oppose — Gnilapooks - The page is well written but still feels rather short
💕 athena, goddess of light! 💕
2015
2014
  • Support — Mario & Luigi: Thrice the Saving (Even though the article is still under construction, it's decent as of now and the story is pretty lengthy as well, and you only did three chapters out of the whole thing. So I would say it's good enough. Lumoshi (talk) 05:01, May 11, 2014 (UTC))
  • Support — Mario Golf: Grand Tour (Very good article, with detailed tables and great artwork. Lumoshi (talk) 05:22, May 11, 2014 (UTC))
  • Support — Megald Warriors (A pretty decent article, although similar to several others. Looks like you put effort into this regardless, and the result is nice. Lumoshi (talk) 00:41, May 14, 2014 (UTC))
  • Oppose — Terrarimon (Article is short compared to other sysop approved articles. Lumoshi (talk) 21:32, May 14, 2014 (UTC))
  • Oppose — Yolo Games (The article is longer than the former, but does not have many things that differentiate it from an average article. Lumoshi (talk) 21:32, May 14, 2014 (UTC))
  • Oppose — Ikimono Red and Yellow (As said before, this is far too short for me to seriously consider it. Lumoshi (talk) 21:32, May 14, 2014 (UTC))
  • Oppose — Kibian (This is probably the best article out of the bunch but parts of it honestly don't look that good and there are better articles that deserve approval more. Kiba has potential as a good character though, and if you make a good enough game I can approve that one :) Lumoshi (talk) 21:32, May 14, 2014 (UTC))
  • Support — BowieQuest V: The Apocalypse (Great article as well, I love the gradiented tables and I also like the way you did the items tables. Lumoshi (talk) 22:50, May 14, 2014 (UTC))
  • Oppose — Super Mario Blowout Not a bad article, but could use some fixing up in terms of look. If you make it look a little better (for example the tables and thumbnails) I'd be glad to approve it. Lumoshi (talk) 22:54, May 14, 2014 (UTC))
  • Support — Paper Mario: The Mechanism Mirror This game is amazing. Lumoshi (talk) 19:39, May 15, 2014 (UTC)
  • Support — Wario & Waluigi: Golden Pyramid Raid (I think it's good enough. Lumoshi (talk) 11:11, May 16, 2014 (UTC))
  • Oppose — The Year Of Luigi Collection (Aside from two paragraphs, the article is mainly a list and not worthy of approval. Lumoshi (talk) 15:03, May 17, 2014 (UTC))
  • Support — Squav It's not a very long page, but it's for a character, complete with everything a character article needs. Lumoshi (talk) 15:11, May 17, 2014 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.
More Fandoms